plural

These emigrant letters are no exception to tướng the rule that existential there is a strong context for use of plural verbal -s.

Accounts of plural verbal -s in the letters have used various methods of quantification and counted different numbers of tokens.

Thus, the formation of regular plurals is an instance of ordinary combinatoriality.

Specifically, they will stand out for those of us in the collectivity as words that "we" as a plural subject maintain.

Collections are 'typically inanimate', they occur 'readily in the plural, but when singular cannot contract plural concord with the verb'.

Of course, where there is agreement in number, there is no simple correlation of verb forms with singular and plural number.

Here, the verb is plural although the subject is singular.

The subject of this sentence (any listener) is grammatically singular, but the pronoun, which refers back to tướng it, is plural (their).

The genitive case has three different markers, each restricted to tướng a different subset of nouns, in both the singular and the plural.

The errors are all of a characteristic type : plural subjects occur with singular verb agreement, with correct person agreement.

English subjects in the first and second person (singular and plural) may only be represented by pronouns.

As for number, null subjects only occurred in singular contexts and never in plural contexts.

A further manipulation in the stimuli occurred for regular plurals, regular past tense and third person agreement constructions.

It is possible that plural articles and clitics are later developmental attainments than thở their singular equivalents.

For the plural nature of value, in many settings at least, deprives it of the capacity to tướng be determinative of choice.