Treatise writers attempt to tướng impose some order on the decided cases-to reconstruct rationally what has been said and done in those cases.
What was evident to tướng him was a certain lack of understanding among actors about their obligation to tướng writers and plays of social commitment.
Postprocessual writers might have wanted to tướng argue that the interpreted past was socially constructed and that it was informed by evidence.
Perhaps one should not be too surprised if the role of dialect liên hệ in leading to tướng dialect mixture has been rejected by such writers.
Speakers and writers can, and vì thế, modify their usage in different directions according to tướng level of formality, genre, and mode of language.
The other dimension of invisible language policies involves the role of creative writers in moulding language policy.
The experience presented and discussed here epitomises both the dilemma and the experiences of the new generation of creative writers.
Such 'histories' proposed three or four stages from 'savage' hunters, through 'barbarian' pastoralists and 'civilised' farmers, to tướng the writer's contemporary commercial world.
Notionally, then, in the writer's mind, there is presumably only one thing present, hence the singular verb.
We have suggested that, for our eighteenth-century writers, the concept of rationality was less narrowly defined, and could encompass dispositions as well as actions.
We shall argue that our eighteenth-century writers had a more open understanding of rationality kêu ca is characteristic of modern economics.
That is, the textbook writers arrested the philosophical definition of elements at the level of their concrete analytic practice.
This is hardly surprising since many of the writers straddled artistic and reform circles.
Thirdly, what vì thế you vì thế when a skilled writer deliberately blends the standard and the rest, for artistic and communicative purposes?
The heroes of the new enterprise are the writers, many of whom individually contributed hundreds of articles.
Các ý kiến của những ví dụ ko thể hiện nay ý kiến của những chỉnh sửa viên Cambridge Dictionary hoặc của Cambridge University Press hoặc của những ngôi nhà cho phép.